Practically Practicing

Practically Practicing

Home
Notes
Archive
About

10,000 Hours of Practice Required to Master a Skill - Fact, Fiction, and Where You Fit on the Timeline

An amateur practices something until he gets it right. A professional practices until he can’t get it wrong!

Gregory Engel's avatar
Gregory Engel
Sep 12, 2025
Cross-posted by Practically Practicing
"The unfortunately named "10,000 Hour Rule" for mastering a skill applies to domains with clearly defined rules, like chess or playing a musical instrument. It has little correlation to domains with loose or undefined rules, like entrepreneurship and management. As for mastering Agile? I'd put that at about 100 hours of deliberate practice."
- Gregory Engel

I first heard of the “10,000 Hour Rule” in Malcolm Gladwell’s book, “Outliers.” I was in my mid 40’s and did the math: With the need to sleep, a busy full-time in IT and other demands on my time I had about an hour a day…maybe…to focus on mastering a single new skill. According to this “rule,” I would need 27 years. And that’s IF I practiced an hour every day for each of those years.

This didn’t seem right.

So I dug deeper and found that Gladwell overly generalized the “rule” and excluded key conclusions from the original research done by Anders Ericsson et al.1 A disservice, really.

The original research involved 30 violinists at a Berlin music academy. They found that the top performers (those with potential as concert-level soloists) had accumulated an average of about 10,000 hours of practice by age 20. Some of those top tier students achieved mastery in significantly less time and some in significantly more time than 10,000 hours. Furthermore, the time were self-reported which means there is a lot of wiggle room for how relevant the 10,000 hour number may be for any individual.

What Gladwell missed, or neglected, was the central thesis to Ericsson’s paper, a theoretical framework organized around and idea stated in the paper’s title: “The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.” The phrase “deliberate practice” appears nowhere in “Outliers” except as a reference to Ericsson’s paper.

So what are the variables that might shorten (or lengthen) the time for mastery? Digging into the research and informed opinions, I’ve come up with two lists: Things we can’t influence and things we can.

Variables We (Mostly) Can Influence

  • Quality and Efficiency of Practice - Sloppy practice gets you sloppy performance. Learn how to tighten up your routines and lessons.

  • Motivation and Mindset - It’s about lighting our own fire and developing a drive for curiosity and interest.

  • Opportunity - These may be difficult to recognize, but there are more than you probably realize.

  • Resources - It’s the Information Age and the Internet has more resources than you can possibly consume in a lifetime study.

  • Quality of Instruction - There are no bad students, only bad instructors.

  • Starting Age - Earlier is definitely better, but neither is it ever “too late.” As the saying goes, “The best time plant a tree is 10 years ago. The second best time today.”

Variables We (Mostly) Can’t Influence

  • Innate Abilities/Genetics - Large hands that are great for playing piano but make playing guitar a challenge.

  • Physical Limitations - Injuries that limit our grip or posture.

  • Luck


"10,000 Hours of Practice Required to Master a Skill - Fact, Fiction, and Where You Fit on the Timeline" last updated on 2025.09.12.


Please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Doing so supports my writing efforts and grants me the most precious of all resources - dedicated time writing. And for that, I am deeply grateful. If you prefer, buy me a cup of coffee if there is an article here and there that you enjoyed or found valuable.

A dedicated forum for discussing all things related to mastering a skill can be found at the Practically Practicing Community web site.


Footnotes

1

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.100.3.363

No posts

© 2026 Gregory Engel · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture